Mowser and dotMobi: Ouch, the cognitive dissonance is huge here for me

What do I get when I mix a top level domain I really do not like, with a concept (transcoding) that I have been grappling with for years, and two really smart guys I highly respect (Russ Beattie and Mike Rowehl)? Severe cognitive dissonance.

I don’t know what to think.

DotMobi

Ok, I am not of the ‘one Internet’ crowd that believes that mobile devices need to be able to view the Web same as any PC. I think that there is and should be many ways to mobilize Websites or use Web services on mobiles. But, I am not of the camp that thinks we should have a top-level-domain specifically for mobile sites.* To me, that’s a ghetto, a return to the bad parts of WAP. So, dotMobi has never sit well with me (this is NOT my employer’s view, mind you).

Transcoding

There is a place for transcoding, depsite what some very very good friends, who know better than I, advise me. Yet, Mowser, which was recently acquired by dotMobi (see link below), is a transcoder. I like it. Some folks (even dotMobi, it seems) are not into transcoders (such as Google’s proxy) that munge all the hard work the Web developer has done. Mowser does a good job trying to stick to that work, and also provides options to go to the full page.

Miker and RussB

Gosh, these are two very smart guys who truly understand the fusion of mobile and Web. And they have the tech chops to put their ideas in practice (magdat and Mowser are examples). Russ and Miker took the ultimate gamble to get Mowser off the ground. Unfortunately, they need to recharge their batteries now before putting in another crack at their ideas, with the learnings from Mowser strengthening them. I am looking forward to them coming back in a few months or a year, reinvigorated and ready to shake the tree some more.

So, yeah, it stinks that Mowser didn’t catch. But, is it good that a top-level-domain company is getting into transcoders? Eh, could be, at least for dotMobi. They already offer a tool from mobileSiteGalore to help folks make .mobi websites (I use Winksite for my personal site and Nokia Conversations, I also use Mippin for Nokia Conversations). Mowser can be well integrated into that.

What do you think?

So, yeah, 1) good for Mowser, 2) good for Miker and RussB, 3) good for dotMobi. It’s just the dotMobi part that must be grating on me. Eh, my problem, not theirs.

Congrats Miker and RussB!

Link [via Tweeps @twhume and @mtrends]: dotMobi Acquires Mowser Assets

dotMobi’s acquisition of Mowser’s technology, developed by Bay Area mobile pioneers Russell Beattie and Michael Rowehl, is another way for dotMobi to provide a complete range of mobile content creation solutions for businesses of all sizes.

“At its heart, Mowser is a PC website-to-mobile website content adaptation engine,” said Trey Harvin, CEO of dotMobi. “dotMobi has been vocal against ‘blind’ content adaptation because it doesn’t allow site owners to have control over their content. dotMobi believes that brands and businesses should always have the final say over how their material is presented, and that the content should uniquely take advantage of the capabilities of a mobile device. This has been one of our core philosophies all along, and something dotMobi is looking forward to addressing with the integration of the Mowser assets into the dotMobi product line.”

*I do think .sex would make a great top-level domain. It can be typed with just the left hand, and might cause a flurry of left handed domain names to be registered. Heh.

2 Comments

  1. Thanks Charlie! Despite any contention over the top level domain the dotMobi folks have done some great stuff with the dev community over the last few years. Developed some great tools and services and published some fantastic recommendations and guides. Any extra tools we can get into that mix that helps and encourages folks to go mobile would be good, which is where we’re trying to take this.
    – Mike

  2. I also don’t really see the point of .mobi TLD. What if I’m running a small site, or a few small sites, should I shell out again for all the equivalent .mobi domains?
    It also means you lose any meaning you might have “encoded” in a county specific TLD. I know google.fi will give easy access to search Finnish language pages, and google.co.uk will let me search UK pages easily.
    I know dell.co.uk will offer prices and tax and special offers and delivery options specific for the UK. Dell.fr will do something similar for France, and will be in French (and deliver a French version of XP).
    Not all companies are completely global. What .mobi should the Bauer Publishing Group (bauer.co.uk) or Bauer Gruppe (bauer.de) buy now a Herr Johannes Bauer has already bought bauer.mobi?
    Transcoding can be useful, especially if you have expensive data rates. Opera Mini is very good, but the (non-Mini) Opera does a good job without a proxy. I prefer using the full-fat websites and to have a decent browser that can render them properly. Only occasionally do I use a mobile specific page, usually when the full-fat page just won’t work.
    I find it very annoying when opening a link in Gmail for mobile, that 1) opens the default S60 browser, and 2) has Google’s transcoding that usually completely breaks the links I visit.
    One funny thing about transcoding via proxy — Opera Mini often gives Norwegian ads, and shows the Norwegain release dates on IMDb!

Comments are closed.