Now that genAI remembers so well, I’d like a bit of forgetfulness

When I started using genAI tools like ChatGPT (whom I call Geoffrey), the tools could not remember what was said earlier in the thread of a conversation. Of course, folks complained. And to be fair, if you’re doing a back and forth to build up an output or an insight, having some sort of memory of the thread would be helpful.

Eventually, all the chat genAI tools did start remembering the thread of the chat you’d be in. And I like that, as I have long-going threads I get back to to further elaborate, update, or return to a topic thread.

On topic in an off way
Then, all of a sudden I started seeing a “memory updated” from Geoffrey after I would say certain assertions about me. Tho I am still trying to find out what triggers this, because for sure, sometimes it updates a memory exactly when I _don’t_ want it to remember something.

What’s more, I tend to have various different threads going and sorta like to keep them separate. I like to keep them separate as some topics are best explored in their own silo, mostly so the ideation isn’t affected by something I didn’t want to influence the ideation with (focus!).

So, one day, when I was in a special thread I set up so that I could ideate off a clean slate, I noticed the answer not only was very similar to an answer on another thread, I felt that the other thread was influencing the current thread (which I didn’t want).

As a test, I asked Geoffrey “what do you think is my usual twist to things?” And it replied correctly in the context of the ideation thread we were discussing. To be fair, the topic was in the same area as a few other threads. But for me, a key thing in ideation is to not get held back by previous ideas.

As an aside, one other feature that is gone: back in the day (like earlier this year), if you asked a genAI tool the same thing, you’d get a different answer. I think the memory is starting to make these tools reply the same.

On topic in an off way
And this extra knowledge and memory isn’t just with ChatGPT. At work, I use Microsoft Copilot. One of the incarnations (there are many, spread amongst the Office apps), with a browser interface, can access ALL my documents in SharePoint, and the corporate SharePoint repositories, and all my emails.

That can be useful when creating something or needing to find something. But this can be a pain when you want Copilot to focus on just one thing.

For example, I wanted it to summarize a document I had downloaded. I told it to only use the document for the summary. But then, in the summary, it started looking across our repositories and email and the summary was a bit skewed by that info.

On topic in an off way
I do believe that memory of some sort is very useful for genAI. And the ability to have a repository of ever-changing data to look up, is also great.

But I think we’ve swung the whole other way: from something with a very short-term memory, to something that now remembers too much and no longer knows what’s relevant to remember.

I am sure in your daily life, you’ve had to tell someone, “thank you for remembering that, but that is not relevant right now.” Or, “thank you for remembering that, but I’d like us to come to this problem with a pristine mind and think anew, not rehash the old.”

On topic in an off way
So we should be careful what we wish for. We got the memory ability we wanted. Now all I am asking is to let me tune a bit of forgetfulness or focus. [Krikey, it can be just in the prompt: “forget this” “use just this thread” or something like that.]

Am I being persnickety? Or is this something that still needs better tuning?

Whimsey, whimsey, whimsey: I love this

Life is too short. I love seeing folks mixing things up like this.

I am a simple midwesterner living in the middle of New York City. I put my shoes on one at a time, I apologize when I bump into people on the street, and I use AI inference (https://universe.roboflow.com/test-y7opj/drop-of-a-a-ha) to drop hats on heads when they stand outside my apartment. Like anybody else. From: “I am using AI to automatically drop hats outside my window onto New Yorkers” [via Adafruit]

Video from I am using AI to automatically drop hats outside my window onto New Yorkers [I didn’t know how to embed from his site, sorry]

What’s the fascination with humanoid robots?

I was reading an interesting article on the fusion of robots and LLMs (see link below). One concept in the article that caught my attention was ’embodied AI’ – that current AI is ‘disembodied’ but once you ’embody’ it, the AI can learn about the world in the same way as living creatures do.

Well, not ‘living creatures’ but ‘humans’ is what article focuses on.

Dr Kendall of Wayve says the growing interest in robots reflects the rise of “embodied ai”, as progress in ai software is increasingly applied to hardware that interacts with the real world. “There’s so much more to ai than chatbots,” he says. “In a couple of decades, this is what people will think of when they think of ai: physical machines in our world.” As software for robotics improves, hardware is now becoming the limiting factor, researchers say, particularly when it comes to humanoid robots (from: Robots are suddenly getting cleverer. What’s changed?)

Hands on my body
I like ’embodied AI’ as it touches on some thoughts I’ve been having on connecting an AI with some action in the physical world. I think folks can be unfair saying that some AI is stupid, when the poor AI not only doesn’t have any connection to the physical world, but they never had the benefit of millions of years of evolution _in_ that physical world (for example, see my comment here).

So, yeah, I suppose the biologist in me groks why embodiment could do wonders for AI learning.

But then, with ‘light is over here’ lazy thinking, folks start wanting AIs to be human-smart and the navigate the world like humans. Because the world is built for humans.

Hm, the biologist in me asks ‘what’s the fascination with humanoid robots?’

BASAAP all the way down
The biologist in me sees humans as a single species among millions. And one answer to being in the real world.

Rather than say, ‘let’s make humanoid robots,’ we should be first asking ourselves (just like nature asks every day) what is the need at hand and what best addresses that need. Nature has exploded into millions of species, each evolved for their needs. The same should be for AIs embodied in robots.

Indeed, I claim that there are many tasks that humans do that would be better suited for something of a very different shape and form. Especially if that thing were clever.

For example, I wonder if a horse’s intelligence would be better for a car than a human intelligence.

It, robot
It is not that I don’t believe in humanoid robots. It’s just that I think most folks jump to humanoid robots without asking if humanoid is the right form factor.*

Decades ago** I learned the term ‘horses for courses’ – each horse has the course it is best suited for.

While I think embodied AI is a great thing to do, I just hope folks realize that embodiment can take many forms (geez, just think of all the forms manufacturing bots have).

We don’t need to ape God and make robots in our own likeness all the time. 🙄

 

** Frakkin’ heck, how many times in Star Wars was either C3PO or R2D2 absolutely not well suited for the environment they were in? What about Daleks (sorta)?
**Earliest reference in this blog back in 2005, tho I remember already using it in my writing in 1999.

Will more free time destroy the world?

I had a brainwave [coincidentally when on my own free time holiday]. I had listened to a series of articles on long work hours in China, changes in American work hours versus others, and investigation into the national psyches behind national days. After all the talk about work vs leisure I realized that the general trend for work vs leisure time is less work and more leisure.

Industrialization, automation, AI – each wave of tech promised us we’d work less and have more time for our own pursuits. Indeed, I feel that as we make tools to take over our work load, we’ll have more attention to walk up Maslow’s Hierarchy.

Beware of what you ask for
Then, I thought back to some holidays I had, like Florence, where everything was mobbed and the sights were overrun and oversubscribed. If here in the US we gripe about travel during Memorial Day and Thanksgiving, I can’t image the gripes about travel during Chinese New Year.

Let’s just say Europe and North America start doing a three-day work week. And that the US starts making 5 weeks off normal (like lots of Europe).

Where are all the people going to go? Dubrovnik (pictured above) is always my example of over-tourism.

What if we have over-tourism all the f-ing time?

Yeah, free time is gonna kill the world. Let’s all just stay shackled to our desks.

😜

What do you think?

Ghost’s manifesto is a call to take back the graph, take back the cloud

Years ago I was trying to find away to keep folks connected across all their various digital streams. At the same time, the large Platforms were kicking off their meteoric rise that came to define the internet for the next 20 or so years. As you have no idea what I was doing back in 2007, you know who succeeded.

In the last few years, tho, people have soured on the way the internet has been built and all eyes are on the Fediverse. The Fediverse is the return to the morselization of the internet and a way to take back our social graph, take back our things that are in the cloud.

Way back when I said:

Do you want to have full control over your data, your social graph, your communications, just like you do now with your mobile phone? Source: Take back the graph! Facebook, The Cloud, and a return to the basics of social networking – Molecularist

Now, Ghost, a newsletter platform whose star has risen after the debacles at Substack, has published a manifesto of sorts in support of ActivityPub, the leading protocol for building the Fediverse.

As the article says:

This has long been the dream, and it seems like the platforms betting on it in various ways — Mastodon, Threads, Bluesky, Flipboard, and others — are where all the energy is, while attempts to rebuild closed systems keep hitting the rocks. Source: Newsletter platform Ghost adopts ActivityPub to ‘bring back the open web’ – The Verge

Alas, I really haven’t dabbled in all this Fediverse stuff. Yes, I have been banging this drum (or a version of this drum) for a while. But my head (and communities) are elsewhere these days. So, while all this is exciting for me, the Fediverse is not not really part of my life.

Maybe some other time.

Tho this quote captures the expectations I and other have as Fediverse takes flight.

That’s the fun part about the fediverse — it’s a lot of old ideas about the web being open and interoperable, but there’s still a lot of new things yet to be invented on top of that foundation. At this point I’m not sure any social platform that launches without an eye towards federation stands a chance, really. Source: Newsletter platform Ghost adopts ActivityPub to ‘bring back the open web’ – The Verge

Banning foreign-owned companies isn’t unprecedented in the US, TikTok is just one of the latest

The whole TikTok-banning story has been interesting to me. I understand that there is little faith in dominant foreign-owned orgs that either sit on our networks or in our social circles.

For me, because it’s in my face often in my daily work, I am reminded of Merck. The US cleaved off the US branch of Merck during WWI, leaving us with 100 years of a US Merck and a German Merck.

More recently, the US government has placed restrictions on Huawei and Kaspersky.

How will this TikTok story progress?

Having lost its fight in Congress, TikTok faces a tough battle in US courts and with China’s own export controls. Source: TikTok has a tricky legal case to make against the ban law – The Verge

The sad thing is, at the heart of this is Trust. China’s behaviors, which I will point out are of a different sort than Russia or Korea, have generated a high level of distrust across the world.

Indeed, there are other countries with various bans on TikTok.

And it doesn’t help China itself bans a slew of foreign-owned internet services.

Banning TikTok, tho, will be interesting. This isn’t some hidden tech, but a leading social network platform in the hands of millions.

I am expecting the eventual outcome to be a banning on government devices, the formation of a US-owned subsidiary keeping US data in the US (à la Merck), and a string of retaliations by China.

What do you think?

[BTW, is DJI next in line?]

Is Autopilot as smart as a horse? (another BASAAP story)

There was an article in the Verge, discussing a recent study by the NHTSA finding Tesla’s poorly designed driver-assist features have been linked to hundreds of crashes and contributed to fatal accidents.

I’m not surprised. So much of Tesla is driven by the imagination of one man, and I keep seeing biases in their design choices that are more based on beliefs than evidence.

But one comment from that man caught my attention.

In an X (can’t call them tweets, right?), his response to a comment on autonomy is “Everything else is like variations on a horse carriage.”

via “Tesla’s in its flop era” – The Verge

I gotta say, if I had to choose between an autonomous car designed by Musk and a horse, designed by millions of years of evolution, I’d choose the horse.

This isn’t about being as smart as a puppy, but being as smart as a horse (#BASAAH?).

 

Image from DALL-E. Worked really hard to get it right and finally just chose to go with this one.

Adidas Sambas are over 30 years of memories for me

I got my first Sambas (the traditional black ones, like in the photo) in college, influenced by some of my friends who were on the soccer team (bless ya, JP) .

OK, I wasn’t a footballer. But I grew up in the land of Samba and soccer, and had all sorts of Adidas stuff since a child. So there was a special connection there.

Rishi Sunak may have rendered them uncool this week, but the trainer has risen to ubiquity in the past few years. So what is it about this fairly simple design that is so widely loved? (From The highs and lows of an It-shoe: how Adidas Sambas took over the world | Fashion | The Guardian)

I wore many pairs of Sambas as my main sneaker for 30 years or so (sometimes putting in different laces)*, until the last one was worn to shreds.

Was hard to not renew my Sambas in the end. But I shifted almost 10 years ago to Vans. And now they are my main sneaker.

Interesting to see all the hullabaloo from Sunak’s reveal (and apology, it seems). Tho, I must say, the black ones I had are the only Sambas to me (which Sunak was _not_ wearing). The rest are just other Adidas sneakers, derivatives of the real deal. 😁

*Laces I remember using – hockey skate laces, purple laces, and checker laces. Style, baby, style.

Photo from Guardian article

Are all GenAI buttons magic fairy dust?

I now have apps everywhere asking me to click a button to use GenAI to do the things I can do myself. So I sorta ignore them.

But last night I saw a Samsung ad on Prime* and the GenAI photo clean up button looked quite similar to the button Evernote keeps putting in front of me.

So I did a quick search to see where else I might have seen such similar buttons.

See the gallery below for a few I quickly found in less than a minute. Aside from Samsung, these are apps I use on a regular basis.

The dream of the future
What does it say about us that all these button designs converge on stars and magic fairy dust. Indeed, that they are all too alike makes me think I am late to the party and there were some shared winks or discussions that the GenAI icon would henceforth be fanciful stars, sorta like the similarities in other icons, like ‘save’ or ‘send’.

But _even_ if there was some agreement among designers, that we chose wishful dreamy stars to represent a GenAI action betrays our techno-optimistic view of what GenAI can do for us.

Clearly the design is meant to evoke magic, inviting folks to engage in a not-threatening way (‘It’s fairy dust!’). But will it be forever, like the disk icon has remained for ‘save’ even after the last of the floppy manufacturers fade away? [Imagining Colossus with a big fairy dust button🤔]

Help out here
What do you think? Also, let me know if you see other similar buttons or fairy-like depictions of GenAI.

Now I’m going to go sprinkle some pixie-dust on this blog post I’ve been working on. 😜

 

*regarding Prime ad – thankfully, only at the start, and not interruptively stupid – I’m looking at you YouTube, especially during TinyDesk Concerts

 

Images, in case you’re still wondering, from Microsoft Copilot in Outlook MacOS, WordPress, LinkedIn, ChatGPT, Samsung, and Evernote

Is Aboard onto something, building with GenAI? (Bonus: BASAAP reference!)

I will admit (not that folks didn’t already know this) I am not really an original kind of guy.[1] Tho I do fool myself into thinking I am a decent remixer, pulling together multiple threads and jammin’ a new tune. Indeed, that’s sort of what I was trained to do at the outset as a scientist – read, learn, investigate various signals, blend the threads, build models, test those models, and deliver new knowledge and insights.

I sorta never have been able to stop doing that.

Just today I was wondering (in the preverbal shower, no less) whether ChatGPT could drive a robot (or car). And then I stumbled upon this article that helped bring together to some signals coalescing in my head.

Aboard is just one of a new class of AI companies, the ones that won’t try to build Yet Another Large Language Model but will instead try to build new things to do with those models and new ways to interact with them. from: Aboard’s AI-powered bookmarking and project app is a new spin on a chatbot – The Verge

Ghost in the Machine
I feel we enjoy saying ChatGPT is only an overengieneered autocomplete because we don’t want to believe there is any intelligence in something built in such a boring way (to me: brute force linking). But if you’ve spent any time with ChatGPT (I’m conversing with it almost daily as a sparring partner, pair coder, ideation tool, among other things) there is an uncanny feeling of some sort of smarts.

Is it the smarts of a savant? Is it the smarts of a puppy (BASAAP!)?[2] Do folks understand the concept of emergent properties?

Doesn’t matter. The interactivity and responses are frakkin’ in some uncanny zone, and only because we know how the sausage is made (sorta). And I think we’re missing the point making ChatGPT pass the Turing test. Why must we insist it be human, any more we insist a dog or a dolphin have human intelligence? We certainly suck at dog and dolphin intelligence, right?[3] ChatGPT only needs to be a smart ChatGPT, and nothing else.

But I digress. Who frakkin’ cares? It’s a formidable tool. And as a tool, what other tricks can it do?

Invisible hand
That leads me to ChatGPT as a puppet master of some sort. What kind of front ends can we build, be they a robot or a webpage (as in Aboard), that ChatGPT manipulates (no idea how) to construct a digital output or a physical action?

If you think of it, our brain is a hyperconnected society of agents working together thru a vessel that allows us to manipulate the environment. Why can’t we provide ChatGPT some input, say converting sensors into something ChatGPT can understand (‘object 3, 2, 1 ft away’), and give it a way to manipulate an output (‘turn wheel left 2 degrees’)?

I don’t know how Aboard does the to and fro with ChatGPT. But seeing already the formats of outputs and inputs ChatGPT is already comfortable with, seeing the add-ons folks have been building to provide ChatGPT with skills, I don’t see why we can’t build other types of glue to provide ChatGPT skills to affect a user interface.

Again, I mean outputs that are not the usual textual or image or what we currently have ChatGPT do. I mean interactive things, things manipulated by ChatGPT.

Between the ears
This is just me seeing different threads and rearranging them in my head, trying to make sense of it, trying to see what permutations click (kinda like PBChoc ideation).

Dunno if this ChatGPT as manipulator is a signal or just a offshoot into nothingness. But now that I’m alert to it, Geoffrey (what I call my ChatGPT) and I will have to go out there and learn more.

 

[1] I once had to take a psychological exam (given by a contractor called ‘Psycho’, no less), when I was being considered for my first job at Nokia. That exam is what made me realize I was great at jammin’, just not originality. And, as a scientist and scholar, I am cool with that. Haha. Oh, and I had to take another psych exam for Business Finland too. What is it with these exams, Finland?

[2] Been thinking of digital smarts for a long time – here’s a 2016 post of mine referring to chatbot smarts, and referring back to puppy smarts from a 2007 convo on systems being BASAAP – ‘Be as smart as a puppy’. I’ve been jammin’ for a long time.

[3] Frak, a lot of footnotes today. In any case, you gotta read this book, or at least the parts on ‘alien’ intelligence. Brilliant.

 

Image from the Verge article